A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo
✓Claimant Sebastian Rodriguez Cardenas
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia excepcional del artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso
- Rechazar por extemporánea
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
El peticionario solicita a la Corporación aclarar el alcance de la sentencia C-367/14, en el sentido de determinar si el cómputo para el trámite de los incidentes de desacato se hace a partir de la recepción de la solicitud o a partir del auto de apertura formal proferido con posterioridad al requerimiento previo.
Al corroborar que la petición se presentó de manera extemporánea, la Sala decide RECHAZARLA por improcedente.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia C-367 de 2014, presentada por el ciudadano Sebastian Rodriguez Cardenas.
- Segundo. ADVERTIR al solicitante que contra esta providencia no procede ningun recurso.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.